NJ Conviction Vacated for Purposes of Immigration and Deportation of Permanent Resident

There is little doubt that the consequences of a NJ criminal conviction on citizenship status has become increasingly complicated. The evolution of the law has not been favorable in this regard but permanent residents, visa holders and defense attorneys may have just caught a break based on a recent New Jersey Supreme Court ruling. The Court ruled in State v. Nunez-Valdez last week that a defendant may vacate a prior guilty plea if he was not informed that the conviction would result in deportation.

Federal immigration law provides for deportation of permanent legal residents (e.g. green card holders) if they are convicted of an aggravated felony. The defendant in Nunez was indicted on a charge of 4th Degree criminal sexual contact - which would clearly constitute an aggravated felony. Notwithstanding, this defendant was never informed that deportation was a virtual certainty if he pled guilty to this charge. Following his entry of a plea to the offense, Mr. Nunez was deported and he thereafter sought post-conviction relief to vacate his plea and reopen his criminal case. The Supreme Court concluded that he should be afforded this opportunity insofar as he presented credible evidence that he would not have entered the plea if informed that he would be deported.  The Court also suggested that the administrative office of the courts undertake efforts to revise criminal plea forms such that the consequences to immigration status are clear when a non-citizen enters a plea.

The decision in Nunez offers considerable opportunity for all those seeking to avoid deportation by virtue of a plea to an aggravated felony in New Jersey. Indeed, a good argument can be made in many cases to support vacating a prior plea and obtain relief from deportation proceedings. We anticipate a flurry of post-conviction relief petitions in response to Nunez.

 

 

Aggravated Assault Downgrade Reached in Howell Vehicular Homicide Case

The Monmouth County Prosecutors Office and a Howell man resolved death by auto charges this week. The underage suspect struck a tree resulting in the death of a 16 year old passenger.  The defendant was allegedly operating his vehicle in a reckless manner at the time of the crash. The resolution included a plea to a downgraded offense of Second Degree Aggravated Assault from an original charge of vehicular homicide. 

In another auto death case, an Ocean County women who was previously a contestant on American Idol, was struck by an individual subsequently charged with a crime. The suspect, who was apprehended and arrested several days after the accident, has been charged with leaving the scene of a fatal accident. The criminal charges are now pending in the Superior Court in Toms River.

While charges of the nature involved in both these cases are extremely serious, this pedigree of offense tends to be susceptible to numerous defenses. This is particularly true where there is no evidence of drugs or alcohol, or where the evidence is prone to collateral attack. Experience in handling complicated issues of intoxication and proof thereof clearly comes in handy in the majority of these cases and one would assume that they could be of assistance in these cases.

 

 

 

 

 

Underage DWI Suspect Has Close Call in Wall NJ

A 19 year old Toms River man narrowly avoided a disaster this weekend. He lost control of his vehicle on Route 34 in Wall, crossed the median, entered a gas station and collided with a gas pump. His SUV sustained considerable damage which prevented the suspect from escaping the scene. He has been charged with DWI, Underage DWI, and Leaving the Scene of an Accident. His case is scheduled to be heard in Wall Township Municipal Court.

Where an individual is below legal drinking age, he or she can be charged with Underage Driving While Intoxicated. This offense carries less severe penalities than a traditional DWI, for example, limited licence suspension, reduced fines, and the conviction does not constitute a conviction for purposes of a subsequent adult DWI. The draw back of an underage conviction is the fact that it only applies where an individual has a BAC below .08% or no readings.

In this particular case, I suspect that the defendant's age shall provide significant opportunity for the defense to mitigate his penalties. If the breath test readings can be supressed or dismissed, the suspect may be able to limit his license suspension substantially. This is the angle we would pursue on this case.

Three Robbery Cases Reported in Monmouth County NJ

The Asbury Park Press reported today on three separate robbery cases which arose in recent days in Monmouth County.  One of the incidents involved an assault turned robbery in Long Branch. There was no weapon involved. In another case in Neptune, the robbery involved a holdup by a suspect armed with a handgun. In the third theft, a shoplifting turned into a robbery in Holmdel New Jersey.

The three cases are interesting as they each illustrate a different pedigree of robbery. In this regard, a theft turns into a robbery where force is used to escape. This is commonly referred to as a strong arm robbery.  A strong arm robbery is a Second Degree offense punishable by 5 to 10 years in prison. Where a weapon is involved, the robbery is termed an armed robbery. Armed robbery is a First Degree charge in New Jersey and carries 10 to 20 years of imprisonment. It is important to keep in mind that an armed robbery need not involve a traditional weapon like a gun, knife or bat; a car can even be a weapon as was the case in the Holmdel robbery wherein the suspect used a car to assault a store employee during escape.

We previously reported on the rise in theft statistics statewide. The report of three robberies yesterday in Monmouth County may be a reflection of this trend.

NJ High Schools Moving Toward Random Drug Testing

Reports and surveys in New Jersey have continually revealed a high incident of alcohol and drug use by high school students. In fact, a survey conducted by the Freehold Regional School District indicated that as much as 50% of high school juniors used these substances. Similar data has been generated by other districts including Hunderdon Central Regional. It also appears that a significant source of concern involves illegal use of prescription drugs.

In response to this information, numerous high schools in the state have put in place or are in the process of putting in place, random drug test protocols for students. Districts have also endorsed policies to screen students for alcohol use, especially at events like proms.

Parents and students can anticipate a rise in the volume of juvenile charges filed throughout the state.  In this regard, police will undoubtedly become involved in some situations where students have positive test results for narcotics and other illegal drugs. This shall also give rise to a litney of legal issues and/or possible defenses. 

Monmouth County NJ Prescription Drug Charges Dismissed

We like to report on particularly good results and interesting issues that our defense attorneys encounter in handling criminal cases in New Jersey. Yesterday, we were fortunate enough to achieve a dismissal of prescription drug possession and related offenses filed against our client in Monmouth County. This particular client had an extensive prior felony record and was looking at multiple third degree charges stemming from prescription drugs, specifically Valium pills, that were found to be in his possession following a routine motor vehicle stop.

New Jersey has a “constructive possession” law when it comes to drug charges. In this particular case, law enforcement claimed that our client was in constructive possession of the Valium that was discovered in the glove compartment of the vehicle. We asserted various defenses to the indictment and criminal charges. In this regard, while the motor vehicle was in the custody and control of our client, it was our position that he lacked knowledge of the existence of the drugs such that he could be deemed in constructive possession of the same.

Although our client was indicted on the charges, we were ultimately able to achieve a dismissal of the case filed against him. It is always satisfying to obtain a dismissal of criminal charges outright such that our client can avoid the impact of a felony conviction. This outcome was very important in this case as our client had four prior felony convictions and was undoubtedly looking at years of state prison time if convicted. Needless to say, the client was estatic with the result and so was I.

NJ Extradition of Drug Distribution Suspect Ends Successfully

There are some days where everything comes together perfectly and that was the situation today.  In this regard, we were retained to represent a women who was a fugitive from New Jersey for almost 20 years for First Degree Cocaine Distribution.  Although she never resorted to serious efforts to disguise her identity and even used her own social security number, it took authorities until June 2009 to arrest her.  She was eventually apprehended by United States Marshalls in the Southeast and was thereafter extradited to NJ to face her charges. Our client was exposed to 10-20 years of incarceration on the original charges and additional time for bail jumping.

The facts surround our client's case literally read like a made for movie storyline. After fleeing NJ, she built a solid, law abiding life, having married, raised three children, graduated with a four year college degree in accounting, and having gained significant career success. She had no prior nor subsequent history of criminal activity.

Upon becoming involved in this case, we immediately made sure that a waiver of extradition was executed such that no unnecessary delay in transport to NJ was incurred. The only thing needed to be accomplished once the waiver was executed was to coordinate transport to New Jersey and insure that this was undertaken immediately. We were able to achieve this goal and the client made her way back to the state within a number of days.  A problem encountered in extradition situations can be, however, adequate notice concerning an extradited suspect's initial appearance in New Jersey. An individual is almost immediately brought before a Judge and communication as to arrival and the initial hearing can be challenging. In this case, we were able to get to Warren County when our client arrived at Court and, rather than simply discuss bail, we engaged the Prosecutor in plea negotiations. The weaknesses in the case were obvious in view of the age of the case (e.g. availability of police officers, changes in vehicle search laws, etc.).  On top of these issues, the Prosecutor was somewhat sympathetic  to our client's situation.

We were able to obtain an extraordinary resolution in our judgment. Our client pled guilty to third degree possession of CDS with no period of incarceration - probation only. Additionally, insofar as the client avoided a conviction for drug distribution, she is eligible for expungement of her conviction. The plea also provided for the immediate release of our client thereby avoiding the significant delay, obvious bail issues (e.g. client committed bail jumping while out on $75,000 bail), which would have resulted in her remaining in a New Jersey jail for months. She was immediately released to her family and only needs to return for sentencing to fully resolve her case. I was ecstatic with the result and I believe our clients shared this view.