New Jersey Involved in Federal Arrest for Marijuana Distribution and Maintaining a Marijuana Production Facility

Posted on November 25, 2009 by John Marshall

A massive seizure of marijuana plants, in excess of 1,000, was reported in the Star Ledger. The arrest was made in conjunction with a joint investigation involving the NJ State Police, Pennsylvania law enforcement, and the Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA"). Approximately $100,000 in cash and 3 pounds of processed marijuana was also seized. It is believed that those arrested shall be charged with Marijuana Distribution, as well as Maintaining a Marijuana Production Facility. The case shall be prosecuted in Federal Court.

In accordance with New Jersey's drug distribution laws, possession of marijuana plants can have severe ramificatons. The penalties for this offense are stiff and include grading as a First Degree Crime to possess fifty (50) or more plants irrespective of the size of the marijuana growings. A crime of the First Degree carries not only ten (10) to twenty (20) years in prison, but automatically triggers the Brimage Guidelines. These guidelines set strict rules for plea offers and negotiations with those falling within its parameters.

As a practicing New Jersey Marijuana Distribution Attorney, I certainly appreciate the goal behind the NJ law concerning possession of marijuana plants. However, this regulation leads to extreme results in my view. For example, the high school senior who is growing small plants in the woods behind his house - should he be incarcerated for over a decade? I think most can glean my opinion in this regard. We will obviously have to continue this fight in our Courts as there is little likelihood of an amendment of this statute in my view.

Tags: , ,

Marijuana Defense Site Is Now Live

Posted on April 22, 2009 by John Marshall

Over the years of defending individuals on criminal charges, it has become readily apparent that NJ Marijuana Possession and NJ Marijuana Distribution are the most frequently encountered drug charges in the state.  Notwithstanding, no where is there a comprehensive source of information concerning marijuana offenses. We therefore developed a website dedicated solely to marijuana issues such as possession, distribution, school zone charges, and possession of marijuana in a motor vehicle.  The site is titled NJ Marijuana Defense Lawyers and we hope readers find the information beneficial. While the site covers considerable subject matter, many questions may remain unanswered.  The NJ Marijuana Defense Attorneys at our firm are available to answer questions and supplement the content found on the marijuana website.

Tags:

Middletown NJ Marijuana Defendant is Exonorated

Posted on March 21, 2009 by John Marshall

I am happy to report that a Middletown NJ financial advisor was recently found not guilty of Marijuana Possession in Wall Township Municipal Court. Hopefully, the result will allow the accused to restore his life.

The facts underlying the marijuana charges were unorthodox.  A package was delivered to the place of employment of the broker in Wall Township.  The package was addressed to the defendant but was opened by the receptionist at his office.  The package contained a small amount of marijuana.  The employer immediately informed the police upon being advised of the package and criminal charges for possession of less than 50 grams of marijuana were filed against the broker.

Under NJ law, an individual may only be guilty of marijuana possession where he or she is in actual or construction possession of the drugs. More specifically, it is illegal for an individual "to possess, actually or constructively...50 grams or less of marijuana." N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10(4).  Where an individual violates this law, he can be convicted of a disorderly persons offense, have his license suspended, be fined, placed on probation and can even go to jail for up to 6 months.  The individual may also apply for a conditional discharge of the charges but this was something that was not a viable option in this case given the impact that could have on the employment of this defendant.

The marijuana possession charge was therefore taken on squarely. The defense was that the prosecutor could not establish possession of the marijuana insofar as there was no evidence that the drugs were the defendants other than the fact that the weed was contained in a package addressed to him.  The defendant never admitted that he ordered the package, that the package was his or that he was even aware of the existence of the package.  In theory, the package could have been the property of anyone, particularly, given the common practice in shipping drugs by mail of sending drugs to an innocent addressee. 

Honorable Thomas Brennan of the Wall Township Municipal Court, someone who our Wall NJ Marijuana Lawyers have occasion to appear before almost weekly on various types of cases, obviously gave the situation considerable thought.  He concluded that the state was unable to satisfy its burden of proof in establishing constructive possession and dismissed the charges. 

The charges in this case had a dramatic effect on the accused. He was fired from his position and is currently unemployed.  However, the outcome of the case provided a level of vindication and one would assume that he has a good argument for regaining his job.  Irrespective, he was successful in avoiding the negative consequences of a marijuana conviction. 

 

Tags: ,